Choosing between Drata and Thoropass depends on your compliance needs. Drata is ideal for organizations that require broad framework support and advanced automation, while Thoropass caters to those prioritizing audit readiness and expert guidance. Here's a quick summary of their key differences:

• Frameworks: Drata supports over 20 frameworks, including newer ones like ISO 42001 for AI governance. Thoropass covers fewer frameworks but includes HITRUST and offers integrated internal and external ISO 27001 audits.
• Automation: Drata excels in AI-driven automation and integrates with over 170 services. Thoropass focuses on simplifying audits with pre-vetted integrations and guided workflows.
• Pricing: Drata's annual cost ranges from $7,500 to $50,000, while Thoropass starts at $5,800.
• Integrations: Drata has a broader range of integrations, while Thoropass ensures auditor-approved connections.
• Support: Drata offers in-product support, while Thoropass provides access to compliance experts and tailored roadmaps.

Quick Comparison:

Drata is better suited for companies managing multiple frameworks or needing extensive automation. Thoropass is a strong choice for businesses focused on audit efficiency and expert compliance support.

Framework Support Comparison

Both Drata and Thoropass provide support for key compliance frameworks, but their approaches and the range of frameworks they cover set them apart.

Number of Supported Frameworks

Drata supports over 20 frameworks, including major standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and CCPA. It also extends its coverage to specialized frameworks such as Microsoft SSPA, ISO 27701, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, NIST AI RMF, CMMC, FFIEC, SOX ITGC, NIST 800-171, ISO 27017, and ISO 27018. Additionally, Drata allows users to create custom frameworks.

In February 2025, Drata expanded its offerings by adding ISO 42001, focusing on AI governance. This update simplifies control mapping for organizations managing responsible AI practices.

Thoropass, on the other hand, takes a more targeted approach. It supports frameworks like SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, HITRUST, CCPA, and PIPEDA, along with the option to create custom frameworks. While its list is shorter, it covers the primary standards that most U.S.-based businesses prioritize.

Thoropass stands out as the only ISO 27001 platform that integrates both internal and external audits within a single system. This feature can be particularly appealing for organizations seeking a seamless ISO 27001 compliance process.

Next, let’s explore how these platforms handle managing multiple frameworks simultaneously.

Multi-Framework Management

Managing multiple frameworks at once can be a complex task, but both Drata and Thoropass offer solutions to simplify the process. Each platform brings its own strengths to the table, helping organizations streamline their compliance efforts.

Drata focuses on reusing controls across frameworks, which significantly reduces time and effort. For instance, a control implemented for SOC 2 can automatically apply to ISO 27001 and other relevant standards through its cross-framework control mapping. This approach minimizes redundancy and makes compliance management more efficient.

Thoropass, on the other hand, emphasizes a "single platform" approach with tailored roadmaps designed to align with an organization’s specific needs. According to Thoropass, this approach can save a mid-market SaaS company managing three frameworks over 950 work hours annually.

Both platforms provide tools like customizable workflows, centralized documentation, and real-time monitoring to tackle complex compliance requirements.

Saskia Bec, an Information Security Analyst at Cinchy, shared her experience with Thoropass:

"Thoropass helps us see all our big objectives and tasks very clearly. The tool helped me understand the bigger picture and what exact documents we needed to upload as evidence."

Drata’s extensive framework support makes it a strong choice for organizations with diverse compliance needs, while Thoropass’s unified audit capability appeals to businesses looking for an all-in-one solution for end-to-end compliance management.

Automation and Monitoring Features

Automation is a key differentiator for modern compliance platforms, and both Drata and Thoropass leverage it to ease the workload of compliance teams. However, the two platforms take distinct approaches to implementing these capabilities.

Core Automation Tools

Drata places a strong emphasis on AI-driven automation. As Adam Markowitz from Drata puts it, "AI is not an afterthought at Drata - it's foundational". The platform automates evidence collection and control monitoring across more than 20 frameworks. It also uses artificial intelligence to assist with security questionnaires, pulling answers directly from Trust Center content.

Drata’s continuous monitoring features enable real-time evidence collection and issue detection, helping teams stay ahead of potential problems. Thoropass also employs real-time monitoring but focuses on detecting and managing compliance challenges through automation. Its features include automated evidence collection, workflow optimization, and policy management, all designed to streamline compliance processes.

Rebecca Houser, Senior Product Manager at Thoropass, highlighted the platform’s ability to integrate compliance tasks into tools that technical teams already use:

"Many compliance activities are technical in nature, and technical resources are valuable to the company. This feature minimizes disruption to technical teams while tracking critical tasks by pushing those tasks straight to the tool those teams work in day-to-day. It's a win for efficiency and for the important relationship between compliance and technical teams".

Both platforms offer customizable workflows tailored to organizational needs. Drata’s “Adaptive Automation” allows for full configurability, while Thoropass provides guided controls that walk users through compliance requirements step by step. These features simplify compliance management and ensure audit readiness.

Efficiency Benefits

The automation features offered by Drata and Thoropass translate into significant efficiency gains. For instance, Thoropass reports that its automation can cut compliance and audit overhead by 80%, with customers completing audits 62% faster than traditional methods. These time savings lead to tangible cost reductions, such as 25% lower audit costs and 50% less time spent on audits. For mid-market companies juggling multiple frameworks, these benefits add up quickly. One SaaS company using Thoropass across three frameworks saved over 950 work hours annually.

Chris Phillips, CTO of Capitalize, shared how Thoropass streamlined his audit process:

"With Thoropass' seamless audit experience, we were able to get the audit done in a fraction of the time it took when I was working with bigger institutions".

Another example comes from Elpha Secure, which completed a reassessment 90% faster than average by leveraging Thoropass's unified controls system. This efficiency was achieved by reusing evidence and controls across multiple compliance requirements.

Emily I., from a mid-market healthcare company, also praised Thoropass for simplifying complex processes:

"Thoropass simplified audit complexities into manageable segments. It provided clear visibility into the status of each control and policy, streamlining our navigation and execution".

Automation Feature Comparison

The table below highlights key differences between the two platforms:

Drata stands out with its extensive integration ecosystem, offering over 170 service integrations compared to Thoropass’s 94+. However, Thoropass focuses on "auditor-approved integrations", which ensures that the data collected aligns with compliance standards, potentially reducing audit risks.

While both platforms excel at minimizing manual tasks, their strategies differ. Drata relies heavily on AI and automation across a wide range of frameworks, whereas Thoropass blends advanced technology with expert guidance to create a more user-friendly, human-supported experience.

Integrations and Platform Features

Compliance platforms shine when they integrate effortlessly with the tools businesses already rely on. Drata and Thoropass understand that seamless connectivity can make or break the efficiency of compliance processes within day-to-day operations.

Available Integrations

Drata boasts an extensive library of over 170 service integrations, spanning cloud providers, HR platforms, and communication tools. It connects with key business systems like AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, BambooHR, Rippling, Workday, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, and Google Workspace. Additionally, Drata offers a public API that supports up to 500 requests per minute per unique source IP, allowing for custom integrations and smooth data exchange.

Thoropass, on the other hand, provides 94+ service integrations, with a focus on auditor-vetted connections. This ensures that the data collected meets compliance standards upfront, potentially reducing back-and-forth during audits. Thoropass integrates with major cloud providers (AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure), HR systems (ADP Workforce Now, BambooHR, Deel, Paychex, Paycom, Rippling, Workday), and business suites like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365.

One standout feature of Thoropass is its two-way Jira sync, which streamlines compliance workflows by syncing tasks, updates, and attachments between platforms. Rebecca Houser, Senior Product Manager at Thoropass, highlighted the feature's impact:

"Many compliance activities are technical in nature, and technical resources are valuable to the company. With this feature, our users can now minimize disruption to their development and infrastructure teams but still keep track of outstanding technical tasks by pushing those tasks straight to the tool those teams work in day-to-day. It's a win for efficiency and for the important relationship between compliance and technical teams".

Growth and Expansion Support

Both platforms are designed to scale alongside growing businesses, with their integrations playing a key role in streamlining compliance as companies expand.

Drata has demonstrated its scalability by supporting 33% of the Cloud 100 companies. Its automation tools allow businesses to apply the same controls across multiple frameworks, saving up to 80% of time on compliance tasks. Kurt Williams, CTO of a Drata customer, emphasized its role in sales:

"Drata is a key part of our sales process because it makes answering security questionnaires dramatically easier. It has become indispensable to my team".

Noah Martin, Co-Founder of another Drata customer, added:

"Drata's level of automation gave us invaluable time savings. The sooner you work with Drata, the easier compliance will be as your company grows".

Thoropass excels at helping businesses manage multiple frameworks and workspaces as they grow. The platform allows users to reuse work across various frameworks, including SOC, HITRUST, ISO, and PCI. Customers have reported cutting audit preparation time by up to 50%.

Integration Comparison Table

Drata stands out for its vast array of integrations and customizable API access, making it a flexible choice for businesses with diverse needs. Meanwhile, Thoropass focuses on providing pre-verified, compliance-ready connections, ensuring data meets audit standards from the start. These distinct approaches underline each platform's strategy for improving compliance management.

sbb-itb-ec1727d

Reporting, Interface, and Support

Both Drata and Thoropass extend their strengths in automation and integration into reporting, interface, and support functions. These areas are critical, as the quality of reporting tools, user interface design, and customer support can heavily influence the effectiveness of a compliance platform. While both platforms address these needs, they take distinct approaches tailored to different organizational priorities.

Report Generation and Dashboards

Drata offers real-time compliance status reports that highlight key issues as they arise. By focusing on real-time monitoring, the platform reduces manual effort and the potential for human error during report creation.

Thoropass, on the other hand, provides customizable, audit-ready dashboards designed to simplify the audit preparation process. These preformatted reports help organizations save time and effort when gearing up for audits.

In essence, Drata leans into real-time compliance visibility, while Thoropass prioritizes audit readiness with flexible reporting tools.

Interface Design and Usability

Drata is widely recognized for its clean and intuitive interface, making it approachable for teams without deep technical expertise. However, as Johnny Chen, SecOps Engineer III at FINIX PAYMENTS, INC, points out:

"The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set up different integrations."

Thoropass adopts a task-based interface, which helps users pinpoint and address compliance gaps efficiently. While this design enhances compliance management, some users have noted occasional dashboard issues that could impact usability.

Customer Support Options

Both platforms offer strong customer support, but their approaches differ in focus and delivery.

Drata provides in-product support alongside direct contact options. Users can reach their support team via email at support@drata.com for technical help and guidance.

Thoropass places emphasis on access to compliance experts and in-house auditors. Organizations can use a contact form for general inquiries or book demos with the expert team. This support structure aims to help businesses create custom compliance strategies and receive ongoing advice.

Interface and Support Comparison

Conclusion

Drata and Thoropass tackle compliance challenges in distinct ways, each catering to different organizational needs.

Drata stands out with its extensive framework support, seamless integrations, and an interface designed to simplify compliance for a wide range of users. Supporting over 20 compliance standards and integrating with more than 170 services, it provides flexibility for businesses operating in complex compliance landscapes. Its clean and intuitive design makes it particularly approachable for teams without extensive technical expertise.

On the other hand, Thoropass focuses on a task-oriented approach, helping teams pinpoint and address compliance gaps efficiently. Its dedicated audit support offers expert guidance for navigating intricate compliance requirements. While both platforms include features like automated evidence collection and real-time monitoring, Drata’s advanced automation tools reduce manual effort more effectively, whereas Thoropass prioritizes audit-ready reporting and customizable dashboards.

For U.S. companies, both platforms deliver full support for critical frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA, which are especially important for North American SaaS businesses. However, Drata’s broader framework coverage may appeal more to organizations with diverse or international compliance needs.

Ultimately, the decision comes down to your organization’s specific priorities. If a user-friendly interface and extensive integration options are top of your list, Drata could be the right fit. But if you’re looking for hands-on audit support and tailored compliance guidance, Thoropass might better suit your needs. With over 70% of businesses expected to adopt compliance automation solutions by 2024, selecting the platform that aligns with your operational goals and growth plans is critical to staying ahead.

FAQs

How do Drata and Thoropass compare in their automation features?

Drata stands out with its impressive automation tools, boasting over 140 integrations and automated evidence collection. These features make managing compliance processes smoother and more efficient from beginning to end. Its continuous automation ensures that workflows stay on track and aligned with compliance requirements.

Thoropass takes a different approach by blending automation with auditor support. This hybrid model not only simplifies tasks like SOC 2 compliance but also prioritizes data security. It’s a great option for organizations that want the efficiency of automation paired with personalized, hands-on guidance.

How do Drata and Thoropass help organizations manage multiple compliance frameworks at once?

Both Drata and Thoropass aim to simplify compliance management by supporting several frameworks at once, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. This approach lets organizations tackle multiple standards efficiently, avoiding duplicate work and unnecessary complications.

By bringing compliance tasks into a single platform and automating critical processes, these tools help businesses save time, minimize mistakes, and stay aligned with regulatory requirements across various frameworks. Their ability to adapt to different compliance needs makes them a practical choice for organizations dealing with complex standards.

Which platform is better for simplifying audit processes: Drata or Thoropass?

Drata stands out for its automation capabilities and continuous monitoring tools, which are designed to streamline and accelerate audit processes. These features are particularly helpful for businesses looking to cut down on manual tasks while staying compliant over time.

Thoropass, by contrast, shines in compliance management and collaboration tools. It’s a solid option for companies that value team-oriented workflows and structured compliance support. While it does offer audit readiness features, Thoropass places less emphasis on automation compared to Drata.

Choosing between the two comes down to your organization's priorities - whether you need more automation or place a higher value on team collaboration.

Related posts

• Shared Password Management for Compliance
• Top 7 Tools for Third-Party Compliance Oversight
• Retail Compliance Tools: Drata vs. Vanta
• What Is Cybersecurity Compliance? (SaaS-Friendly Guide)