When preparing for security compliance, should you choose a SOC 2 Gap Analysis or an ISO 27001 Pre-Assessment? Here’s a quick breakdown:

• SOC 2 focuses on Trust Services Criteria (security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, privacy). It’s ideal for service organizations, especially SaaS companies in North America.
• ISO 27001 centers on building a formal Information Security Management System (ISMS) with global recognition. It’s better for companies with international operations or complex compliance needs.

Key Differences:

1. Outcome: SOC 2 provides an attestation report; ISO 27001 grants a certification valid for three years.
2. Scope: SOC 2 is tailored to specific controls; ISO 27001 covers 114 controls across 14 domains.
3. Timeline: SOC 2 is quicker (3–9 months); ISO 27001 takes longer (9–18 months).
4. Cost: SOC 2 is less expensive due to its narrower focus; ISO 27001 requires more resources.

Quick Comparison Table:

Which Should You Choose?

• SOC 2 is better if you’re a North American SaaS company focused on customer data.
• ISO 27001 works well for global organizations needing a comprehensive security framework.
• Some businesses pursue both to meet diverse customer and compliance demands.

Start by identifying your goals, market needs, and resources to decide the right path. Both assessments help improve security and compliance readiness.

Main Differences: SOC 2 vs ISO 27001 Assessments

Assessment Focus: Trust Services vs ISMS

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 take different approaches to evaluating security controls. SOC 2 focuses on the Trust Services Criteria (TSC), which includes five areas: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Among these, security is mandatory, while the others are optional.

ISO 27001, on the other hand, emphasizes creating an Information Security Management System (ISMS). This involves implementing security measures tailored to an organization’s specific needs. ISO 27001 assessments review the effectiveness of 114 controls listed in Annex A.

ISO 27001’s structure makes it a good fit for organizations with more complex or global compliance requirements.

Market and Industry Focus

These frameworks also cater to different markets. SOC 2 is widely used by service organizations like SaaS providers, cloud platforms, and data centers. It’s especially relevant for B2B companies operating in North America.

ISO 27001, being internationally recognized, holds value across a broader range of industries. Companies dealing with sensitive data often seek ISO 27001 certification to meet varied customer expectations. For instance, a tech company reported a 35% drop in security incidents and a 20% boost in customer retention after adopting ISO 27001.

Results: Certification vs Attestation

The outcomes of these assessments differ significantly. ISO 27001 results in a formal certificate valid for three years, with annual audits to maintain compliance. SOC 2, on the other hand, provides an attestation report that evaluates the organization’s controls based on the TSC.

SOC 2 attestation reports can have different outcomes:

• Unqualified: Controls are effective.
• Qualified: Some controls have deficiencies.
• Disclaimer: Not enough information provided.
• Adverse: Major security risks identified.

A shift in industry standards highlights the growing importance of ISO 27001. For example, Microsoft announced it would no longer accept SOC 2 reports with only security coverage after December 2021. Instead, ISO 27001 certification will now be required for the security portion, alongside ISO/IEC 27701 for privacy. This change reflects the increasing global preference for ISO 27001, especially when working with leading technology providers.

What Should We Do First? ISO 27001 or SOC 2?

Assessment Methods and Steps

Here’s a breakdown of the steps involved in SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assessments, based on the compliance insights discussed earlier.

SOC 2 Assessment Process

The SOC 2 gap analysis is a step-by-step evaluation of an organization’s security controls against the Trust Services Criteria. It starts with a review of documentation and a self-assessment, which can be done internally or with a third-party auditor.

Here’s how it typically works:

• Initial Documentation Review:
  Organizations collect and examine all relevant security documentation, such as policies, procedures, and current controls. This step usually takes 2–4 weeks, depending on how prepared the documentation is.
• Control Mapping:
  Automated tools, like Vanta, are often used to simplify the process of mapping controls.
• Gap Identification and Risk Assessment:
  Any gaps in compliance are identified and prioritized for remediation before the final SOC 2 audit.

ISO 27001 Assessment Process

The ISO 27001 pre-assessment is more extensive, focusing on the entire Information Security Management System (ISMS). It usually involves the following:

Choosing an accredited certification body for the pre-assessment is important to ensure alignment with certification standards. The evaluation covers compliance with the main clauses (4–10) and Annex A controls, offering a detailed view of the organization’s security practices.

Assessment Timeline Planning

Planning timelines is critical for both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assessments. Here’s a general guide:

• SOC 2:
  • Pre-audit preparation: 1–3 months for Type I, 1–9 months for Type II
  • Remediation period: 3–6 months
  • Audit completion: 1–2 months
• ISO 27001:
  • Pre-assessment and preparation: 4 months for small to medium businesses
  • Certification audit: 6 months
  • Total timeline: 9–18 months on average

Using compliance automation tools can help speed up processes like documentation and control mapping, saving valuable time.

sbb-itb-ec1727d

Results and Reports

Gap Analysis Results

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assessments offer insights that help organizations enhance their security practices. However, they differ in focus and coverage:

These differences guide organizations toward tailored strategies for addressing their specific security needs.

Report Types and Content

The structure and details of reports also vary between these frameworks. SOC 2 gap analysis reports provide in-depth reviews of control performance, pinpoint gaps, assess risk levels, and recommend fixes. ISO 27001 pre-assessment reports, on the other hand, are more streamlined, focusing on readiness for certification by identifying nonconformities, assessing ISMS maturity, spotting documentation issues, and suggesting process improvements.

"The audit results in a report containing the auditor's opinion, management's assertion, description of controls, user control considerations, tests of controls, and results."
– Rhonda Willert, Partner at Linford & Co.

These reports serve as a foundation for targeted improvement plans.

Improvement Planning

To effectively address gaps, organizations should focus on the following steps:

• Rank findings: Assess the severity and compliance impact of each gap.
• Allocate resources: Identify the resources needed to resolve the issues.
• Set timelines: Develop achievable schedules for implementing changes.
• Track progress: Use clear metrics to monitor improvement efforts.

Selecting the Right Assessment

Selection Criteria

Choosing between SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assessments depends on your organization's priorities, market requirements, and long-term objectives. Here's a comparison of key factors:

"ISO 27001 is beneficial for businesses that require a more comprehensive and internationally recognized information security management system. Conversely, if your business operates in sectors that deal directly with storing or processing client data, like a SaaS, then SOC 2 could be more advantageous".

These factors can help you decide whether to focus on one framework or pursue both.

Using Both Assessments

Some organizations choose to complete both assessments. The two frameworks have about 80% overlap in criteria, and completing one often prepares you for 70% of the other.

"These two standards elevate each other".

Once you've selected your approach, it's essential to weigh the financial and operational demands.

Budget and Resource Requirements

After deciding on a path, consider the following resource needs:

• Documentation: ISO 27001 requires extensive ISMS documentation, while SOC 2 focuses on specific controls.
• Staff Training: ISO 27001 involves the entire organization, while SOC 2 typically requires targeted team participation.
• Maintenance: ISO 27001 includes annual surveillance audits, while SOC 2 requires periodic reporting.
• Technology: Both frameworks may require investment in security tools and monitoring systems to meet their standards.

Partnering with experienced providers, like Cycore Secure, can help simplify the process and improve efficiency during implementation.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Key Differences Summary

SOC 2 focuses on Trust Services Criteria and is primarily relevant in North America. In contrast, ISO 27001 requires an Information Security Management System (ISMS), has global recognition, and involves a three-year certification process with annual audits.

Working with Assessment Providers

Given the distinctions between these frameworks, choosing the right assessment provider is crucial. A skilled provider can simplify the process and help you meet overlapping compliance requirements effectively. Look for a provider that can:

• Conduct detailed initial evaluations
• Offer step-by-step remediation advice
• Assist with implementing necessary controls
• Help develop proper documentation
• Provide ongoing monitoring solutions

For instance, companies like Cycore Secure (https://cycoresecure.com) specialize in offering customized security, privacy, and compliance services, making them a valuable partner for navigating both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 assessments.

Starting Your Assessment

Once you’ve selected your provider, kick off the compliance process with a clear, structured plan:

Related Blog Posts

• 7 Essential Steps to Achieve SOC 2 Compliance in 2025
• Virtual CISO or Full-Time CISO: Making the Right Choice
• 5 Common ISO 27001 Compliance Mistakes to Avoid
• Policy Management for SOC2, HIPAA, and GDPR